Honour Forums

Discuss the Honour system.

1. Sam Mustafa
   Le Grand Fromage

   On this thread:

   http://www.sammustafa.com/honour/forum/topic/sold-out-and-now-pdf-download

   Alan asked me about a discrepancy with two of the errata, and whether or not they appear correctly in the PDF. At first glance, I thought that I had somehow failed to include those errata in the Lasalle rules PDF. Upon further investigation, I realized that the PDF was correct, and the errata was in error!

   For example, there was no need to "correct" that sentence at the end of the Army Morale section on page 66 from "11 or more" to "more than 11." It is correct, as written, in the PDF. And there was not a missing "Not" in a sentence about entrenchments on page 75. The sentence was correct as written.

   So I've corrected the errata. The PDF is fine.

   best,
   Sam

   Posted 1 year ago #

2. Mycenius
   Member

   Hi Sam - just to confirm - the PDF version of the RULEBOOK is absolutely correct now as it stands and you don't believe there is any other errata needed to be added to it in the foreseeable future?

   Thanks,

   John

   Posted 1 year ago #

3. Sam Mustafa
   Le Grand Fromage

   As far as I can see, yes, that's correct.

   Posted 1 year ago #

4. Mycenius
   Member

   Thanks Sam.

   Posted 1 year ago #

5. Marechal La Haie
   Member

   So what we're saying here is that there shall be no errata for the errata errata, and those responsible for the sacking of those that were just sacked, have been sacked?

   Posted 1 year ago #

6. Sam Mustafa
   Le Grand Fromage

   Something just bit my sister....

   Posted 1 year ago #

7. Mycenius
   Member

   Sam - I just purchased the PDF version of the rulebook yesterday (to supplement my original hard copy so I have a version with the errata incorporated) - something I noticed is the (Divisional) Commander Command Range is still showing as 10BW on both Page 20 and the QRS at rear - I thought it had been reduced to only 4BW based on feedback about players manipulating it to bypass the poor commander disadvantage - or was that just an unofficial thing and this is still the intended rule?

   TIA,

   John

   Posted 1 year ago #

8. Sam Mustafa
   Le Grand Fromage

   If you're referring to the "I'm With Stupid" rule, No, that's an Optional rule.

   Posted 1 year ago #

9. Mycenius
   Member

   If you're referring to the "I'm With Stupid" rule, No, that's an Optional rule.

   Ahh, right - I'm with you now...

   Posted 1 year ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.